UCLA Today News Logo

:: UCLA TODAY Home

:: Contact Us
Search Archive
:: UCLA HOME

 

 

 

©2004
The Regents of the University of California
 

 
UCLA IN LA
He wins publics trust over toxic soil

When Torrance residents found their soil had been contaminated with DDT, they grew suspicious of the EPA until chemical engineering Professor Yoram Cohen stepped into the fray to help their community in crisis.

BY DAVID BROWN
UCLA Today

Imagine yourself in this position: You’ve just learned that your house was built on land contaminated by toxic waste, and the yard where your children used to play is laced with poisonous chemicals. Then, you are informed that the only solution is for you to leave your home in the care of government officials who will clean up your property by excavating soil from your yard and under your house.

When you try to ask questions, you get unsatisfactory answers. The government officials from organizations such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are probably telling you the truth. But you are frightened and slightly disoriented, and you don’t know if what they are doing is best for the future of your home and family.

That’s what residents of a Torrance neighborhood experienced when startling concentrations of DDT were discovered in the soil. And that’s when U.S. Rep. Jane Harmon (D-Redondo Beach) turned to UCLA Chemical Engineering Professor Yoram Cohen to help them through this crisis.

The community comprises approximately five square blocks in the Del Amo area where DDT had been found in “concentrations that were alarming,” Cohen said. The contamination was the result of decades of production of the pesticide in the area.

As remediation got under way, “they uncovered at one point essentially what amounted to pure DDT,” Cohen said. A frightened community became even more alarmed and turned to Cohen.

By then, the Del Amo Action Committee had been formed and “an adversarial relationship between the community and the EPA was not helping to ease the community fears,” Cohen said.

Up until that time, residents had to rely on the EPA for information.

“That wasn’t good enough for the community,” Cohen said. “And, as often is the case, suspicion developed.”

For example, at one point, neighborhood residents tried to take a duplicate sample from a “hot spot” but were prevented from doing so by EPA officials because the residents lacked the necessary training in hazardous waste sampling.

“The community wanted someone to come in and give them an unbiased opinion,” Cohen said. “One of the major problems is the lack of communication between the EPA and the community. There’s a lack of trust,” said Cohen, who has also worked with an Alaskan community on air pollution problems. “They needed an honest broker.”

That’s the role Cohen took on, at Harmon’s request. When the EPA finished a cleanup of the area, Cohen and Stanford Professor Perry L. McCarty did a study reassuring the community that the cleanup was adequate, but they also recommended ongoing monitoring to protect residents from possible exposure to DDT if there was ever new construction in the area.

The scientists also had concerns about the hazardous material that was removed from the site. Although safely collected, the containers of contaminated soil could still be seen by residents. “They drive by and see all this contaminated material, and it is not very conducive for good feelings or healing,” Cohen said.

“As scientists, we often forget about the social implications of what we do,” he said. Acting as independent advisers on projects such as these gives them an opportunity to change that.
“This would be an excellent opportunity for university faculty to use their knowledge to help the public,” he said.

 

Copyright 2002 UC Regents
Questions / Problems? | [HOME]